Chief Justice Roberts Joins Dissent Critiquing "Shadow Docket" Usage In Pollution Ruling

The shadow docket is another term, , to describe emergency actions taken by the that don’t go through the full briefing and hearing process of a formal opinion. Justices don’t have to explain their ruling, give no explanations as to why each justice voted the way they did, and decisions can be unsigned–not showing how each justice voted.

In the current iteration of the Supreme Court, the use of the shadow docket has seen an uptick–from to  . Critics point to a lack of transparency concerning these shadow docket rulings and that recent ones have sided with conservative ideologies.

The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision on Wednesday, reinstated a Trump-era ruling that limited the ability of states and tribes to restrict projects under the Clean Water Act. that Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberal judges in diss ent. Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the court majority had “gone astray.”


“That renders the Court’s emergency docket not for emergencies at all,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the four dissenters. She said that the Republican-led states and others that had petitioned the court for emergency relief had not shown they would suffer the necessary irreparable harm to make their case.

The five conservative judges did not explain their reasoning to reinstate the rule. This is in direct contrast with Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s comments this week for . If there is no explanation, there’s nothing for the public to refer to. , if the Supreme Court is able to continue without some sort of oversight or check, then how reliable is the highest court of the land if it only serves the needs of one party?

Earthjustice, representing environmental groups and tribes expressed disappointment with the ruling:

“The court’s decision to reinstate the Trump administration rule shows disregard for the integrity of the Clean Water Act and undermines the rights of tribes and states to review and reject dirty fossil fuel projects that threaten their water,” said Moneen Nasmith, senior attorney for the group.

Source: Chief Justice Roberts Joins Dissent Critiquing “Shadow Docket” Usage In Pollution Ruling

About Us

Vinegar Hill Magazine is a space that is designed to support and project a more inclusive social narrative, to promote entrepreneurship, and to be a beacon for art, culture, and politics in Central Virginia.


Recent News

Past Publications

You May Also Like

Advocates: Black cops not exempt from anti-Black policing

Advocates: Black cops not exempt from anti-Black policing

The fact that Black officers killed a Black man didn’t remove racism from the situation. NEW YORK (AP) — That the death of Tyre Nichols — young, Black, just trying to get home — came at the hands of Memphis police officers was a familiar refrain in the nation’s...

Analysis: Two Black quarterbacks set for historic Super Bowl matchup

Analysis: Two Black quarterbacks set for historic Super Bowl matchup

Patrick Mahomes and Jalen Hurts will be the first Black QBs to face off in a Super Bowl. PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Black quarterbacks have come a long way in the NFL since Fritz Pollard became the first to play in the league in 1923 and Doug Williams was the first to start...

What should inclusion at work look like in 2023?

What should inclusion at work look like in 2023?

DE&I remains a hot topic on the corporate streets. But how do diversity, equity, and inclusion show up in the 2023 workforce? Diversity, equity, and inclusion are the hottest topics on the corporate streets. Regardless of the industry, those three words, often...

Pin It on Pinterest